What type of attorney is Jan Schlichtmann?
civil justice lawyer
Jan Schlichtmann is a nationally known environmental and civil justice lawyer whose work has inspired a book and movie.
Is a civil action a true story?
Based on Jonathan Harr’s best-selling book, the movie tells the true story of eight families who saw their children die of leukemia in Woburn, Mass., possibly because of contaminated water from a nearby factory. The families of Woburn turn out to be such a case.
Who is Jan Schlichtmann in a civil action?
431 (denial of defendants’ motion to dismiss). A 1998 film of the same name, starring John Travolta as plaintiff’s lawyer Jan Schlichtmann and Robert Duvall as Beatrice Foods attorney Jerome Facher, was based on the book.
Who was Jerome facher?
Jerome Facher, a Boston lawyer who successfully defended a tannery accused of water pollution that plaintiffs linked to a cluster of childhood leukemia deaths — a case that became the basis of a best-selling book and a Hollywood movie — died on Sept. 19 at his home in Arlington, Mass. He was 93.
How much money did Mr schlichtmann want to settle the case?
Schlichtmann turns down a pretrial settlement offer of about $4 million from Beatrice. Later the jury absolved Beatrice of liability. The jury did find Grace liable, but another round of testimony would have been required before damages could be awarded. Mr.
Did Jan Schlichtmann win the case?
Schlichtmann took the case to trial and won $4.7 million. It was thought to be the largest malpractice award in Massachusetts history. Woburn was his next case. In East Woburn, eight families had lost children to leukemia over a span of two decades.
How much did Grace’s Vice President offer Mr schlichtmann?
Ultimately Mr. Schlichtmann won about $8 million from Grace for the injured families, but after trial and investigation expenses were deducted from his share, he was left with so little that he declared personal bankruptcy.
What does rule 11 attempt do?
Rule 11 refers to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Rule 11 is intended to make sure that when an attorney or a party submits a legal document to the Court in a civil litigation, he believes in good-faith that the document is truthful, supported by the law, and is being submitted for an appropriate purpose.
When Mr Schlichtmann went to the tannery What did he see that caused him to accept the case?
2. When Mr. Schlichtmann went to the tannery, what did he see that caused him to accept the case? He saw the company discarding waste, and he also saw wealthy companies that he could sue.
Who won the Woburn case?
Schlichtmann
Schlichtmann took the case to trial and won $4.7 million. It was thought to be the largest malpractice award in Massachusetts history. Woburn was his next case. In East Woburn, eight families had lost children to leukemia over a span of two decades.
What does Jan Schlichtmann do now?
Jan Schlichtmann Joins ClassAction.com as Of Counsel Attorney.
How much money did Mr schlichtmann partners want to settle the case?
Schlichtmann turns down a pretrial settlement offer of about $4 million from Beatrice. Later the jury absolved Beatrice of liability.
Why does Jan Schlichtmann want to be a lawyer?
Projects are the lawsuits Schlichtmann believes in, because through them he can honor his most basic passions: to right wrongs and, even more fundamental, to expose the truth.
What did Jan Schlichtmann learn from the Woburn case?
Twenty-five years after taking on the case of his life, and a decade after A Civil Action made him famous, Jan Schlichtmann is back in the spotlight—this time going after the Turnpike Authority in a half-billion-dollar lawsuit. But has he learned his lesson from Woburn? The jury’s still out.
What happens if Jan Schlichtmann wins Big Dig case?
If he wins or, more probably, settles to his liking, the case will rewrite not only legislation in Massachusetts—which in 1997 passed the law that set up the Big Dig repayment plan—but also legislation throughout the country.
What kind of tax lien did Jan Schlichtmann have?
Of course, it’s worth noting that Schlichtmann’s evangelism for settling cases quickly grew in its fervor at the same time that he needed money. According to public records, until 2003 he had numerous liens against him: property tax, state and federal income taxes.